Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 22, 2020. It is now read-only.

[WIP] Frames #14

Open
wants to merge 41 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[WIP] Frames #14

wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

RazerM
Copy link
Member

@RazerM RazerM commented Mar 21, 2016

This is in very early stages, as I say in one of the commit messages:

Everything is currently untested, in the wrong place, and lacking comments.

It's a work in progress to look at implementing Frames in idiomatic Python, to be cleaned up and refactored before it's ever merged.

I can't stress how un-tested this is: some of the code hasn't even touched the interpreter.

I intend to work on it in this branch, so others can have a look at the implementation as it develops. I welcome your criticism!

RazerM added 4 commits March 21, 2016 21:35
Everything is currently untested, in the wrong place, and lacking comments.

It's a work in progress to look at implementing Frames in idiomatic Python, to be cleaned up and refactored before it's ever merged.
@RazerM
Copy link
Member Author

RazerM commented Mar 21, 2016

I added the downloadspk branch as the base, will open a new PR when that is merged

RazerM added 11 commits March 23, 2016 23:40
The parametrization was very useful while writing the
rotation code, but it slows down the tests too much now that they pass.
Using __getattr__ is slow for FrameProxy, so now inherits from AbstractFrame and implements proxy properties directly.

The FrameProxy now uses a function to register the factory function, which is cleaner. I didn't want to have

@FrameProxy
def GCRF():
    return Frame(...)

since that isn't as clear reading the source that GCRF is a FrameProxy.
Tested with pytest-benchmark.
@RazerM RazerM changed the base branch from downloadspk to master November 27, 2016 11:01
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant