Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shortcuts refactor and validators explicit usage #172

Merged

Conversation

p1c2u
Copy link
Collaborator

@p1c2u p1c2u commented Sep 2, 2022

No description provided.

@p1c2u p1c2u force-pushed the refactor/shortcuts-refactor-and-validators-explicit-usage branch from 7211d7b to 000a15d Compare September 2, 2022 10:01
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #172 (000a15d) into master (1ed28ff) will decrease coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #172      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.58%   91.27%   -0.32%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         416      401      -15     
  Branches       64       64              
==========================================
- Hits          381      366      -15     
  Misses         24       24              
  Partials       11       11              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
openapi_spec_validator/validation/proxies.py 74.07% <ø> (ø)
openapi_spec_validator/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
openapi_spec_validator/shortcuts.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@p1c2u p1c2u merged commit ded5eff into master Sep 2, 2022
@p1c2u p1c2u deleted the refactor/shortcuts-refactor-and-validators-explicit-usage branch September 2, 2022 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant