Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-104223: Fix issues with inheriting from buffer classes #104227
gh-104223: Fix issues with inheriting from buffer classes #104227
Changes from 8 commits
b7fb7a4
c717784
9fcb214
88ce24d
80a4b0b
6e31664
b73e29c
15ad02d
9ded873
3b50138
056efee
9ee8eb5
5536853
02d7b9c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test in which the class has multiple inheritance? Also tests for when there are two or classes in mro which support buffer protocol?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding some tests. It's hard to come up with a case where multiple bases support the C buffer protocol, because that will almost inevitably lead to:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, maybe try one var length and one pure python type which implements buffer protocol.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, just pushed. Thanks for the review!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, you would have to write a custom type in C whose layout doesn't conflicts for that. Probably an object which has just object header and supports buffer protocol.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH, I agree this is an edge case but I try to be extra careful when touching
typeobject
, hope you don't mind the extra work.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better to catch this now then right before 3.12 final!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed the bug I outlined above, I'll have to step out for a few hours and fix it after that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking about it more, that crash isn't actually due to PEP 688: it reproduces without any Python
__buffer__
method. So I don't think there's any more interesting cases to cover for PEP 688.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filed #104297 for that case.