-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-104050: Add type annotations to sentinels in Argument Clinic #104589
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3b12493
gh-104050: Add type annotations to sentinels in Argument Clinic
erlend-aasland 5c1c2df
Merge branch 'main' into typed-clinic/sentinels
AlexWaygood d145ff8
Fix stuff
erlend-aasland 5833421
Revert unneeded change
erlend-aasland 703c417
Fix local rebase and write nicer if for line 2700
erlend-aasland File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, The type of
Sentinels.Null
is justSentinels
. For Python enums, all enum members are instances of the enum class. (This is why I was wondering if maybe theNull
class should just be left as it is; it maybe needs to be its own class, rather than sharing the same class as the other sentinel values.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, you're right.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we should amend this instead:
cpython/Tools/clinic/clinic.py
Lines 2605 to 2607 in dcdc90d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think my approach is fundamentally flawed. This is pretty simple really: we simply want distinct (sentinel) types for
default_type
and the instance check (🥁).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if we're in agreement or not (possibly my brain's going fuzzy at the end of a long day 😆), but I think for this PR, I might keep the refactor for
unspecified
andunknown
, but leaveNull
as it is onmain
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fab, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The annotation for
default_type
is probably also incorrect.cpython/Tools/clinic/clinic.py
Lines 2598 to 2607 in dcdc90d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks correct to me based on the comment and usage. But maybe I'm not seeing something. What makes you think it's incorrect?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With a custom converter, you can override pretty much anything (AFAIK), so I think
bltns.type[Any]
is too narrow. I might be wrong.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment indicates that
default
has to be an instance ofdefault_type
ifdefault_type
is notNone
, andisintance(x, Foo)
for any givenx
will fail ifFoo
is not an instance of type or a tuple of objects which are instances oftype