Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-88287: Add BufferingFormatter documentation. (GH-96608) #96608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2022

Conversation

vsajip
Copy link
Member

@vsajip vsajip commented Sep 6, 2022

@vsajip vsajip added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news labels Sep 6, 2022
@vsajip vsajip changed the title gh-88287: Add BufferingFormatter documentation. gh-88287: Add BufferingFormatter documentation. (GH-96608) Sep 8, 2022
@vsajip vsajip merged commit d5e0786 into python:main Sep 8, 2022
@vsajip vsajip deleted the fix-88287 branch September 8, 2022 07:22
@vsajip vsajip added needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes labels Sep 8, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @vsajip for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @vsajip for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Sep 8, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-96674 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Sep 8, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-96675 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants