-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing lines-covered and lines-valid attributes #17738
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
763e8c4
Add missing `lines-covered` and `lines-valid` attributes to Cobertura…
x612skm 09734a5
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 32d10be
Add missing `lines-covered` and `lines-valid` attributes to Cobertura…
x612skm 84a59fd
Update tests for type check fix
x612skm 770f099
Merge remote-tracking branch 'fork/master'
x612skm 19a4c70
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 83559c1
Fix unit tests
x612skm 12fedcc
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like you're testing a separate thing here. It's usually best to follow the AAA principle — checking one single thing per test: https://automationpanda.com/2020/07/07/arrange-act-assert-a-pattern-for-writing-good-tests/.
Hence, it's best to add new test cases unless you change the aspects of the existing ones. Just don't pile on extra logic. The tests must remain simple.
It's probably not a good idea to check substrings in XML text. No need to check if Python's XML writer works. The goal is to check that the reported produces the object having proper XML attributes. It's easier to check it against the object representation.
OTOH, looking closer, I think that the only change to really needed is changing that expected XML string on line 40. That test already checks everything needed, but you changed the produced output, so this test will keep failing until you adjust the expected value to match that new output shape.