Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 1: Update outdated language referring to Travis CI and plain-text PEPs #2347

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

CAM-Gerlach
Copy link
Member

Presently, PEP 1 states that PEPs will be checked via Travis CI a couple places, which this PR updates to refer to generic "CI" (in case we change from GHA in the future, since such implementation details have no business being in a governance PEP). Also, it updates a few related outdated references referring to the legacy plain-text format in new/active PEPs.

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach self-assigned this Feb 21, 2022
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach requested review from AA-Turner and JelleZijlstra and removed request for warsaw and ncoghlan February 21, 2022 02:11
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach force-pushed the pep-1-remove-travis-ci branch from 5f6a199 to 77c9014 Compare February 21, 2022 02:13
pep-0001.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach marked this pull request as draft February 21, 2022 02:35
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach force-pushed the pep-1-remove-travis-ci branch from b29d2a4 to f5c68a1 Compare February 21, 2022 02:36
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2022 02:36
pep-0001.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0001.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach marked this pull request as draft February 21, 2022 18:20
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach force-pushed the pep-1-remove-travis-ci branch from 8df1416 to f4ec7e9 Compare February 21, 2022 18:22
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2022 18:22
@CAM-Gerlach
Copy link
Member Author

I've applied all the changes and looks like we all approve, so going ahead with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants