Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 683: Immortal Objects v3 #2372

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022

Conversation

ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

This is mostly changes in response to https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/KDAR6CCMPOX36GQJUDWHQBKRD5USNV3B/. Also, we increase the focus on the immutability of per-object runtime state.

@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member Author

@eduardo-elizondo

Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few small comments.

pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ericsnowcurrently and others added 3 commits February 28, 2022 15:11
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0683.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-0683.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title [PEP 683] Immortal Objects v3 PEP 683: Immortal Objects v3 Feb 28, 2022
@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

Thanks both, looks good!

A

@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member Author

@eduardo-elizondo, I'm going to merge this (and post to python-dev) soon unless you have any changes to include.

Copy link

@eduardo-elizondo eduardo-elizondo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just went through all the changes. Huge thumbs up on my end, this definitely clarifies a bunch of the points that have been brought up in the various python-dev threads as well as leaving the implementation details open enough to keep iterating and improving this over time as long the initial change is close to perf neutral.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants