-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PEP 683: Immortal Objects v3 #2372
PEP 683: Immortal Objects v3 #2372
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few small comments.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Thanks both, looks good! A |
@eduardo-elizondo, I'm going to merge this (and post to python-dev) soon unless you have any changes to include. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just went through all the changes. Huge thumbs up on my end, this definitely clarifies a bunch of the points that have been brought up in the various python-dev threads as well as leaving the implementation details open enough to keep iterating and improving this over time as long the initial change is close to perf neutral.
This is mostly changes in response to https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/KDAR6CCMPOX36GQJUDWHQBKRD5USNV3B/. Also, we increase the focus on the immutability of per-object runtime state.