Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 602: Mark as Active Process #3736

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Mar 24, 2024

Helps #2872.

PEP 602 is a Process PEP rather than Informational or Standards Track:

A Process PEP describes a process surrounding Python, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process. Process PEPs are like Standards Track PEPs but apply to areas other than the Python language itself. They may propose an implementation, but not to Python’s codebase; they often require community consensus; unlike Informational PEPs, they are more than recommendations, and users are typically not free to ignore them. Examples include procedures, guidelines, changes to the decision-making process, and changes to the tools or environment used in Python development. Any meta-PEP is also considered a Process PEP.

And as such won't ever be be "fully implemented" and marked as Final.

Instead, it should be set to Active:

Some Informational and Process PEPs may also have a status of “Active” if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. PEP 1 (this PEP).

Also remove some redundant headers/emacs metadata.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3736.org.readthedocs.build/

@hugovk hugovk requested a review from ambv as a code owner March 24, 2024 15:27
@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2024
12 tasks
@ambv ambv merged commit ccc89f2 into python:main Apr 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep602-mark-as-active branch April 17, 2024 11:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants