-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Break XPU][Inductor] Generalize new introduced device-bias code. #126261
Conversation
Inductor. [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/126261
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit e5cec93 with merge base 2d35b45 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
…s code in" Inductor. cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang [ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
We find some Inductor test case failues when enabling Inductor UT for Intel GPU, the root cause is new introduced Inductor device-bias code from recent community PRs, which cause differnet beheaviors between Intel GPU and CUDA. This PR generalize these codes to align their beheaviors. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#126261 Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/peterbell10
…U. (#127595) The XPU expected failure test case `TritonCodeGenTests.test_codegen_config_option_dont_assume_alignment` should have been expected passed after the PR #126261 merged, but due to test flaky, this case was skiped when landing the PR. The expected failure but passed error then exposed in periodic test: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/9302864965/job/25605549183#step:14:2082. Pull Request resolved: #127595 Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/chuanqi129, https://github.com/peterbell10, https://github.com/atalman
…U. (pytorch#127595) The XPU expected failure test case `TritonCodeGenTests.test_codegen_config_option_dont_assume_alignment` should have been expected passed after the PR pytorch#126261 merged, but due to test flaky, this case was skiped when landing the PR. The expected failure but passed error then exposed in periodic test: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/9302864965/job/25605549183#step:14:2082. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#127595 Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/chuanqi129, https://github.com/peterbell10, https://github.com/atalman
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
We find some Inductor test case failues when enabling Inductor UT for Intel GPU, the root cause is new introduced Inductor device-bias code from recent community PRs, which cause differnet beheaviors between Intel GPU and CUDA. This PR generalize these codes to align their beheaviors.
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @peterbell10 @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang