Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.8] Bump quarkus to 3.8.5 and enable qute extension #296

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

jedla97
Copy link
Member

@jedla97 jedla97 commented Jun 5, 2024

@rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

rsvoboda commented Jun 6, 2024

agroal-reactive-mysql-client-rest-client-reactive-jackson-resteasy-client-jsonb-smallrye-jwt.log

- io.quarkus:quarkus-rest-client-reactive-jackson
- io.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-jwt
- io.quarkus:quarkus-resteasy-client-jsonb
- io.quarkus:quarkus-agroal
- io.quarkus:quarkus-reactive-mysql-client

[ERROR] 	[error]: Build step 
 io.quarkus.resteasy.reactive.common.deployment.ResteasyReactiveCommonProcessor#checkMixingStacks
 threw an exception: jakarta.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException: Mixing RESTEasy Reactive and 
 RESTEasy Classic client parts is not supported

combination of quarkus-resteasy-client-jsonb and quarkus-rest-client-reactive-jackson needs to be whitelisted + similar combinations

@jedla97
Copy link
Member Author

jedla97 commented Jun 6, 2024

Looking at error it seems that rest-client wasn't renamed to resteasy-client per https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/wiki/Migration-Guide-3.7#rest-client-gear-white_check_mark

It§s interesting that it wasn't catched by CI before

…asy client jsonb and jaxb with reactive rest extensions
@jedla97 jedla97 force-pushed the 3.8-bump-quarkus branch from faa4a29 to 2a33ac3 Compare June 6, 2024 10:29
@jedla97 jedla97 requested a review from rsvoboda June 6, 2024 12:07
@rsvoboda rsvoboda merged commit d155c66 into quarkus-qe:3.8 Jun 6, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants