Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump io.smallrye.reactive:smallrye-mutiny-vertx-core from 3.6.0 to 3.7.2 #36674

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 24, 2023

Bumps io.smallrye.reactive:smallrye-mutiny-vertx-core from 3.6.0 to 3.7.2.

Dependabot compatibility score

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps io.smallrye.reactive:smallrye-mutiny-vertx-core from 3.6.0 to 3.7.2.

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: io.smallrye.reactive:smallrye-mutiny-vertx-core
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the area/dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 24, 2023
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2023

Failing Jobs - Building b60dbe7

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs Build scan
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Build Failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 17
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 21

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 #

- Failing: extensions/scheduler/deployment 
! Skipped: extensions/quartz/deployment integration-tests/main integration-tests/resteasy-reactive-kotlin/standard and 2 more

📦 extensions/scheduler/deployment

io.quarkus.scheduler.test.PausedSchedulerTest.testSchedulerPauseResume line 47 - More details - Source on GitHub

org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: expected: <false> but was: <true>
	at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.build(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:151)
	at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.buildAndThrow(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:132)

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Oct 25, 2023

@mkouba I saw io.quarkus.scheduler.test.PausedSchedulerTest.testSchedulerPauseResume fail a few times. Do you think it could be a timing issue given CI is very slow?

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Oct 25, 2023

Let's merge given it's aligning with the BOM: https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/bom/application/pom.xml#L65

@gsmet gsmet merged commit e50692b into main Oct 25, 2023
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.6 - main milestone Oct 25, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/maven/io.smallrye.reactive-smallrye-mutiny-vertx-core-3.7.2 branch October 25, 2023 08:30
@mkouba
Copy link
Contributor

mkouba commented Oct 25, 2023

@mkouba I saw io.quarkus.scheduler.test.PausedSchedulerTest.testSchedulerPauseResume fail a few times. Do you think it could be a timing issue given CI is very slow?

It could be. In this particular case, we wait for 2 seconds which should enough but if the CI is really slooow then no timeout is big enough ;-).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants