Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing redundant code, adding jwks_path property #4450

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2019
Merged

Removing redundant code, adding jwks_path property #4450

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2019

Conversation

sberyozkin
Copy link
Member

I've removed some code which was marked for the deletion, and also remove the doc references to the secret properties since it is not tested right now, so I don't know if we can doc it right now. I propose to doc only those properties which are being tested.

Thanks

@sberyozkin
Copy link
Member Author

Note credentials.secret property is still obviously supported but until we have a test confirming it is supported at the Vertx level with a test, it is probably better not to type it everywhere :-) Pedro may help with a test so we'll make it visible asap


// RFC7662 JWKS service address
if (config.jwksPath.isPresent()) {
options.setIntrospectionPath(config.jwksPath.get());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a copy/paste error?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does, thanks for catching it

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny, I was staring at the code yesterday evening for a long time :-)

@sberyozkin
Copy link
Member Author

@stuartwdouglas, @gsmet Not sure if it is already too late for 0.24.0, that temp code was really my target, I'll add a 0.24.0 milestone, Guillaume, please move it to 0.25.0 if it is too tight

@sberyozkin sberyozkin added this to the 0.24.0 milestone Oct 9, 2019
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me now, let's merge.

@gsmet gsmet merged commit cb3dbcb into quarkusio:master Oct 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants