Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: rustls version conflict when using questdb-rs #77

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

fix: rustls version conflict when using questdb-rs #77

merged 10 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

jerrinot
Copy link
Contributor

@jerrinot jerrinot commented Jul 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

lock ureq to 2.9
a workaround for algesten/ureq#765

@jerrinot jerrinot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 9, 2024
@jerrinot jerrinot changed the title fix: lock ureq to 2.9 fix: rustls version conflict when using questdb-rs Jul 9, 2024
amunra
amunra approved these changes Jul 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@amunra amunra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!
As an extra bonus I've seen the new updated dependences have fewer transitive dependencies too. Nice!

@bluestreak01 bluestreak01 merged commit a6248a2 into main Jul 12, 2024
11 checks passed
@bluestreak01 bluestreak01 deleted the jh_lock_ureq branch July 12, 2024 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mtopolnik mtopolnik mtopolnik approved these changes

@amunra amunra amunra approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jerrinot @mtopolnik @amunra @bluestreak01