Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Merge registry-bootstrap-ds.yaml and registry-ds.yaml #26

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 29, 2018

Conversation

venkatsc
Copy link
Collaborator

Both registry-bootstrap-ds.yaml and registry-ds.yaml uses registry as the name, this doesn't allow both to be created at the same time. Renaming one cannot resolve the registry.

Current fix relies on the explicit declaration of bootstrap node in deploy/config.yaml to current label based approach and initializes bootstrap device when registry pod created on given bootstrap node.

…at doesn't create one of the daemonset

Renaming it cannot resolve the registry. With current fix, using explicit declaration of bootstrap node the problem is solved.
@johscheuer
Copy link
Collaborator

Actually if both Deployments/Daemonsets uses the same set of labels and you create the according Service that selects the Pods with the according labels it should work without any problem. Anyway I think it's a good way to merge both Daemonsets for simplicity.

@venkatsc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

venkatsc commented Mar 22, 2018

Thanks. In that case, renaming one of the daemonset should work fine, if decided against merging.
@Meatz Could you please share your opinion on this?

…egistry-bootstrap without bootstrap flag

This will not crash the Pod(install_quobyte does the same).
…uobyte/registry-bootstrap without bootstrap flag"

Crashing of registry is not a problem. DeviceInspector can be used to fomat device as registry once bootstrap is up and running.
This reverts commit e8ca3c7.
@grawinkel grawinkel merged commit 5a3fb2b into quobyte:master Mar 29, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants