Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating the api versions for clients #5018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ytimocin
Copy link
Contributor

@ytimocin ytimocin commented Jan 24, 2023

Description

Updating the api versions for the clients.

Issue reference

Fixes: #issue_number

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Adds necessary unit tests for change
  • Adds necessary E2E tests for change
  • Unit tests passing
  • Extended the documentation / Created issue for it

@ytimocin ytimocin requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2023 23:37
Comment on lines -24 to 25
dm "github.com/project-radius/radius/pkg/linkrp/datamodel"
linkrp_dm "github.com/project-radius/radius/pkg/linkrp/datamodel"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

double import

Comment on lines -36 to +35
Value: to.String(&properties.AppId),
Value: properties.AppId,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason why we got the address of the AppId and then got the value of the address?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably just for fun. This was probably a copy-paste issue

Comment on lines +16 to +23
// https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
SQLManagementClientAPIVersion = "2021-11-01"

// https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/redis/resource-manager/readme.md
RedisManagementClientAPIVersion = "2022-06-01"

// https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/cosmos-db/resource-manager/readme.md
DocumentDBManagementClientAPIVersion = "2022-08-15"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I got the most recent stable API versions of these clients to hard-code them per the discussion here: #4864 (comment). Do you think this looks right @rynowak?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ytimocin ytimocin merged commit dc325df into main Jan 25, 2023
@ytimocin ytimocin deleted the ytimocin/clientV2/apiVersions branch January 25, 2023 03:07
mishrapratikshya pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
# Description
Updating the api versions for the clients.

## Issue reference
Fixes: #issue_number

## Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of
the following list:

* [x] Code compiles correctly
* [ ] Adds necessary unit tests for change
* [ ] Adds necessary E2E tests for change
* [x] Unit tests passing
* [x] Extended the documentation / Created issue for it
mishrapratikshya pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2023
# Description
Updating the api versions for the clients.

## Issue reference
Fixes: #issue_number

## Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of
the following list:

* [x] Code compiles correctly
* [ ] Adds necessary unit tests for change
* [ ] Adds necessary E2E tests for change
* [x] Unit tests passing
* [x] Extended the documentation / Created issue for it
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants