Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run codecov action only once #7427

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Run codecov action only once #7427

merged 17 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

youngbupark
Copy link

Description

Codecov should run once for linux amd64.

Type of change

  • This pull request fixes a bug in Radius and has an approved issue (issue link required).
  • This pull request adds or changes features of Radius and has an approved issue (issue link required).
  • This pull request is a minor refactor, code cleanup, test improvement, or other maintenance task and doesn't change the functionality of Radius (issue link optional).

Fixes: #issue_number

@youngbupark youngbupark requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2024 19:00
@youngbupark youngbupark changed the title Run codecov action only for linux amd64 Run codecov action only once Apr 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Test Results

3 135 tests  ±0   3 128 ✅ ±0   3m 25s ⏱️ -7s
  261 suites ±0       7 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2751b86. ± Comparison against base commit 36050b0.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.82%. Comparing base (36050b0) to head (182669f).

❗ Current head 182669f differs from pull request most recent head 2c5b8e2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2c5b8e2 to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7427       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   46.79%   63.82%   +17.02%     
===========================================
  Files         500      416       -84     
  Lines       44893    23436    -21457     
===========================================
- Hits        21007    14957     -6050     
+ Misses      22342     7222    -15120     
+ Partials     1544     1257      -287     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 63.82% <ø> (+17.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
@youngbupark youngbupark temporarily deployed to functional-tests April 1, 2024 21:48 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository radius-project/radius
Commit ref 2c5b8e2
Unique ID func3f15210375
Image tag pr-func3f15210375
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.10.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.1.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func3f15210375
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func3f15210375
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func3f15210375
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func3f15210375
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting kubernetes functional tests...
⌛ Starting shared functional tests...
⌛ Starting daprrp functional tests...
⌛ Starting cli functional tests...
⌛ Starting samples functional tests...
❌ Test tool installation for ucp failed. Please check the logs for more details
❌ Failed to install Radius for ucp functional test. Please check the logs for more details
❌ ucp functional test failed. Please check the logs for more details
❌ datastoresrp functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details
❌ cli functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details
❌ daprrp functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details
❌ samples functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details
❌ shared functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details
❌ msgrp functional test cancelled. Please check the logs for more details

Signed-off-by: Young Bu Park <[email protected]>
@youngbupark youngbupark temporarily deployed to functional-tests April 1, 2024 22:01 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository radius-project/radius
Commit ref 2751b86
Unique ID funcfc3aeb2598
Image tag pr-funcfc3aeb2598
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.10.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.1.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-funcfc3aeb2598
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-funcfc3aeb2598
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-funcfc3aeb2598
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-funcfc3aeb2598
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting daprrp functional tests...
⌛ Starting msgrp functional tests...
⌛ Starting cli functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp functional tests...
⌛ Starting shared functional tests...
⌛ Starting datastoresrp functional tests...
⌛ Starting samples functional tests...
✅ msgrp functional tests succeeded
✅ kubernetes functional tests succeeded
✅ ucp functional tests succeeded
✅ daprrp functional tests succeeded
✅ cli functional tests succeeded
✅ datastoresrp functional tests succeeded
✅ shared functional tests succeeded
❌ Test tool installation for samples failed. Please check the logs for more details
❌ Failed to install Radius for samples functional test. Please check the logs for more details
❌ samples functional test failed. Please check the logs for more details
⌛ Starting samples functional tests...
✅ samples functional tests succeeded

@youngbupark youngbupark merged commit 72dfb50 into main Apr 2, 2024
18 checks passed
@youngbupark youngbupark deleted the youngp/run-codecov-linux branch April 2, 2024 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants