Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document Retro feedback 9/1 #243

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
shubhi-raft opened this issue Sep 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Document Retro feedback 9/1 #243

shubhi-raft opened this issue Sep 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@shubhi-raft
Copy link
Collaborator

shubhi-raft commented Sep 7, 2020

Description:
Document Retro action items from 9/1 Mural retro in Teams and create issues to address feedback.

AC:

  • retro items action items have been documented
  • Issues have been created for defining acceptance criteria for research feedback
  • Task is added to current issues for including more annotation and documenting in code of why system is the way it is

Feedback already being implemented:

  • Smaller slices of user stories
  • Earlier check-ins and reviews
  • Raft sharing uninformed thoughts

Supporting Documentation:

(please include any relevant log snippets/ files/ screen shots here.)

Open Questions:

(any clarifying questions in support of the issue)

@shubhi-raft shubhi-raft self-assigned this Sep 7, 2020
@shubhi-raft shubhi-raft added this to the Sprint 3 milestone Sep 7, 2020
@lfrohlich
Copy link
Collaborator

I see that issue #244 was created for defining acceptance criteria for research feedback

@lfrohlich
Copy link
Collaborator

@shubhi-raft Has the task for annotation and documentation been added to current issues? /Has it been added to the template?

@shubhi-raft
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lfrohlich Not really, but it has been added to the manual testing practice checklist #173. I think this aligns with our discussion on AC/DoD #221 and reviewing dev DoD at the Sprint level against the QASP.

@lfrohlich
Copy link
Collaborator

lfrohlich commented Sep 28, 2020

This was completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants