Fix license summary

[cdce8p]

In #86 I changed the way licenses are handled to allow the --from=all option. That meant however that the license classifier wasn't written into the package metadata anymore if the wasn't any.

This PR uses select_license_by_source to correctly identify which license should be counted.

Closes #93

--

Regarding the dev branch: This should definitely be address there as well. However since the structure changed, a rebase on its own won't do it. I would suggest that I open and additional PR just for it once the dev branch is rebased correctly.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #94 (7b710aa) into master (3c9aab1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #94   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.94%   98.94%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         380      380           
=======================================
  Hits          376      376           
  Misses          4        4           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
piplicenses.py	98.94% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3c9aab1...7b710aa. Read the comment docs.

[raimon49]

@cdce8p @johnthagen Thanks for the report and the correction 👍

[raimon49]

Regarding the dev branch: This should definitely be address there as well. However since the structure changed, a rebase on its own won't do it. I would suggest that I open and additional PR just for it once the dev branch is rebased correctly.

Yes, we will.