Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eliminate literals passed to device_uvector::set_element_async #367

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2021

Conversation

harrism
Copy link
Member

@harrism harrism commented Mar 10, 2021

After rapidsai/rmm#725 is merged, this PR updates cuspatial to eliminate passing literal values to device_uvector::set_element_async.

@harrism harrism added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 10, 2021
@harrism harrism self-assigned this Mar 10, 2021
@harrism harrism requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2021 23:29
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ descend_quadtree(LengthsIter counts,
thrust::inclusive_scan(
rmm::exec_policy(stream), parent_counts, parent_counts + num_quads, parent_offsets.begin() + 1);

parent_offsets.set_element_async(0, 0, stream);
uint32_t init{0};
parent_offsets.set_element_async(0, init, stream);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why eliminate one 0 literal and not the other?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great question. Only the value parameter (second parameter) is pass-by-reference, so that's the only one we are disallowing to be a literal. The first parameter, the index, is pass-by-value so it's perfectly safe to use a literal since it will be copied rather than referenced, and so we don't have to worry about the lifetime of the temporary inside set_element_async.

Copy link
Contributor

@thomcom thomcom Mar 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That answers my question, yes. But why have one argument be pass by reference and one pass by value? They're both primitives. The 0 is only going to be used by the callee, and the init is going to be passed around and modified by others but has to be initialized here? Thanks!

rapids-bot bot pushed a commit to rapidsai/cugraph that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2021
After rapidsai/rmm#725 is merged, this PR updates cuspatial to eliminate passing literal values to device_uvector::set_element_async.

Companion PR to rapidsai/cuspatial#367

Authors:
  - Mark Harris (@harrism)

Approvers:
  - Seunghwa Kang (@seunghwak)
  - Alex Fender (@afender)
  - Andrei Schaffer (@aschaffer)

URL: #1453
@harrism harrism requested review from trxcllnt and cwharris and removed request for zhangjianting March 17, 2021 21:46
@cwharris cwharris added 4 - Waiting on Author Waiting for author to respond to review 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge and removed 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team 4 - Waiting on Author Waiting for author to respond to review labels Mar 18, 2021
@cwharris
Copy link
Contributor

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit d43f506 into rapidsai:branch-0.19 Mar 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants