This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 23, 2024. It is now read-only.
Remove Futures #662
Merged
Remove Futures #662
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JessyCatterwaul
force-pushed
the
remove-futures
branch
4 times, most recently
from
fab3e07 to
68a0251
Compare
added 4 commits
April 1, 2022 14:30
Making PersistenceStore generic would be a lot of ugliness for negligible gain.
JessyCatterwaul
force-pushed
the
remove-futures
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4b7e30e to
916717b
Compare
added 9 commits
April 1, 2022 15:10
This is temporary; there is a GitHub issue to go along with this.
JessyCatterwaul
force-pushed
the
remove-futures
branch
from
916717b to
3db7bbb
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Step 1 for updating the app for Swift Concurrency: eliminate all usage of
Combine.Future.Fixes #645