Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build: expose
READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH
variable #9971Build: expose
READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH
variable #9971Changes from 9 commits
b883971
da64970
709062b
6997939
3e766c3
e2d647a
ffe29de
097eb4e
3dc547a
fb83a4e
66fe0a7
378fcef
cc39779
5617c70
eecd917
1be646e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like an awkward place to introduce conda. Previously this function didn't know about conda at all, and I'm wondering if it's the right place for this logic? Or perhaps we need to rename this function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have a strong preference here. It's the same code -- The only difference is the prefix (virtualenv or condaenv variable). I put it in the super-class only to avoid repetition of the same logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I updated this to make the code more explicit: 66fe0a7. Let me know if that looks better 👍🏼
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is definitely nicer. Though I'd argue the
venv
in the name is misleading for conda envs :) Perhaps it should just be calledenv_bin
or similar? Not a huge deal tho.