Join our Rust "scripts" crates into one #5889
Assignees
Labels
🧑💻 dev experience
developer experience (excluding CI)
Comments
emilk
added
enhancement
emilk
added
🧑💻 dev experience
5 tasks
Wumpf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 15, 2024
### What * Fixes #5889 Puts a bunch of tooling under a new extensible home. ``` pixi run dev-tools --help ✨ Pixi task (default): cargo run -q --locked -p re_dev_tools -- --help Usage: re_dev_tools <command> [<args>] Various development tools for Rerun. Options: --help display usage information Commands: build-examples Build examples and their manifest. build-web-viewer Build the web-viewer. search-index Meilisearch indexer and REPL ``` Intentionally left out `re_types_builder` since it's fairly big on its own. ### Checklist * [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable) * [x] I have tested the web demo (if applicable): * Using examples from latest `main` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/5972?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/main/examples_manifest.json) * Using full set of examples from `nightly` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/5972?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/nightly/examples_manifest.json) * [x] The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG * [x] If applicable, add a new check to the [release checklist](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/tests/python/release_checklist)! - [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/5972) - [Recent benchmark results](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/crates.html) - [Wasm size tracking](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/sizes.html) To run all checks from `main`, comment on the PR with `@rerun-bot full-check`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We (well, @jprochazk) have started porting more and more
.shand.pyscripts to Rust, and so far I think it has been a win. However, so far each such "Rust script" has become its own separate crate, which I think is the wrong direction:Cargo.toml,srcfolder,main.rs, maybe aREADME.md)So, I think we should consider an xtask-esque approach, where a single Rust binary multiplexes out into different Rust "scripts", so that each script is just a file added to the same crate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: