MVP Version 3 with Chainlink Mocked #13
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jasonklein
deleted the
mvp-version-3-proposing-content-mocked-chainlink
branch
This was referenced Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the ability to propose content from the front end. Unlike with consuming content, the user does sign and send the proposal transaction and so needs to have gas to pay for the transaction.
It makes several name changes and introduces a number of new events and public state variables.
To keep things "simple," I'm taking the approach that the smart contract does not need to keep track of content items beyond their proposal, validation, and consumption. That information is sent to the smart contract so that the information can be stored on-chain via events. So, one cannot call the smart contract to learn which content items a user (address) has consumed, only that the user has a certain number of points. But an off-chain system is able to review the blockchain history and reconstruct which content items have been proposed and consumed by which address.