feat(run): use resolved input if file exists

[autarc]

NOTE

This PR is is based on #335 as changes there are connected with this use case. It will be rebased as there are updates and also [refer then in the test to the @rollup/plugin-virtual module rather than the relative path.

The modified files are:

• packages/run/rollup.config.js
• packages/run/src/index.ts
• packages/run/test/test.js (will be updated with a new version of @rollup/plugin-virtual)
• packages/run/package.json (will be updated with a new version of @rollup/plugin-virtual)
• pnpm-lock.yaml (will be updated with a new version of @rollup/plugin-virtual)

Rollup Plugin Name: run

This PR contains:

• bugfix
• feature
• refactor
• documentation
• other

Are tests included?

• yes (bugfixes and features will not be merged without tests)
• no

Breaking Changes?

• yes (breaking changes will not be merged unless absolutely necessary)
• no

Description

The run plugin allows to run a bundle directly after its output is written to the disk. For figuring out the correct entry filename it uses the input entry point. As the virtual plugin allows to specify inline scripts instead of real paths the matching is currently failing. To solve the issue its initially checked if the input entry is pointing to an existing file, otherwise the value is taken as is.

Along with the update of the virtual plugin in #335 this allows to successfully run the output of bundles initiated through virtual files.

[shellscape]

Thanks for the PR, but I'm a bit confused. You're referencing an unknown plugin named "build," but we don't have any plugins named that here. Did you mean the run plugin?

It looks like this is dependent on #335, so we'll put a hold label on this until that one is resolved.

[autarc]

@shellscape Yeah sorry for the confusion. As you said the run plugin was meant so I've updated it in the header. It clearly depends on #335 so it is certainly better on hold until we know how to proceeded there. Perhaps the change in this PR might afterwards be even redundant. Just though pushing it for feedback might be an idea since I already had it locally working.

[shellscape]

Totally, thanks for clarifying. We'll tackle this once #335 is resolved.

[shellscape]

Closing as abandoned as it depends on #335 which was closed as abandoned.