Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CHANGELOG #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2021
Merged

Add CHANGELOG #39

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2021

Conversation

STRML
Copy link
Contributor

@STRML STRML commented Mar 30, 2021

Given that a lot of people are coming to this repo to understand the recent CVE - and whether they should do the major version upgrade to 2.x or stay on 1.1.0, I thought this would be helpful.


Mask size is no longer infered by the number of bytes provided.

This means that the input `216.240` will no longer be interpreted as `216.240.0.0/16`, but as `0.0.216.240/32`,
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The convention is actually to parse this as 216.0.0.240. The last commit fixes that.

@rs rs mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2021
@rs rs merged commit fb14b4f into rs:master Mar 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants