Change Performance/CollectionLiteralInLoop to not register offenses for Array#include? that are optimized directly in Ruby.

[Earlopain]

Fix #482. Since include? on arrays are the only instances I ever run across this cop, I think it makes sense to add special handling for this.

On Ruby 3.4 this does no array allocations:

require "memory_profiler"

class Foo
  def bar
    Bar.new
  end
end

class Bar
  def baz
  end
end

foo = Foo.new
report = MemoryProfiler.report do
  [1,2].include?(foo.bar.baz)
end.pretty_print

Also, this code is simply slower on Ruby 3.4:

require "benchmark/ips"

local = [301, 302]
val = 301
Benchmark.ips do |x|
  x.report('local') do
    local.include?(val)
  end

  x.report('literal') do
    [301, 302].include?(val)
  end
  x.compare!
end

$ ruby test.rb
ruby 3.4.1 (2024-12-25 revision 48d4efcb85) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]
Warming up --------------------------------------
               local     1.822M i/100ms
             literal     2.296M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
               local     18.235M (± 1.6%) i/s   (54.84 ns/i) -     92.906M in   5.096277s
             literal     22.807M (± 1.5%) i/s   (43.85 ns/i) -    114.789M in   5.034289s

Comparison:
             literal: 22806932.0 i/s
               local: 18235340.7 i/s - 1.25x  slower

---

Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

• The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
• Wrote good commit messages.
• Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
• Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
• Squashed related commits together.
• Added tests.
• Ran bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and runs RuboCop on its own code.
• Added an entry (file) to the changelog folder named {change_type}_{change_description}.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format for details.

[Earlopain]

🤔 how do I get the oldest rubocop version tests to pass when it doesn't know about ruby34?