-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removal of files option of the cli + dep upgrade + cs #175
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this. There are still refferences to the files
subcommand and the cli tests still use it also, that's why they are failing.
Due to what we discussed on #170 it probably doesn't make sense to support .rs
migration files here, so we should introduce differentiation between just .sql
files and both of them similar to what we had here to be called on just .sql
files for the cli
case, sorry I missed it on #170.
What do you think?
How come I forgot to touch the logic :D stupid me. Anyway, about what you said. Sorry, I didn't get it, why should we only run |
OK, I think I understood what you mean. We should add the |
Hi, no worries 😀 meanwhile I have addressed that issue while working on #177, see jxs@fa28ffc and feel free to rebase against EDIT: turns out no need, so I'll just review :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM thanks! 🎆
config_location: &str, | ||
grouped: bool, | ||
divergent: bool, | ||
missing: bool, | ||
env_var_opt: Option<&str>, | ||
arg: &ArgMatches, | ||
path: &str, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for this improvement 👌
OK, cool 👍🏼 |
Fixes #174