-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixed the error message for a user to open the crate #14969
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @weihanglo (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
Previously reviewed at #14957 |
Thanks! |
You're welcome, Page! |
Update cargo 10 commits in 99dff6d77db779716dda9ca3b29c26addd02c1be..652623b779c88fe44afede28bf7f1c9c07812511 2024-12-18 00:55:17 +0000 to 2024-12-20 15:44:42 +0000 - fix(package): use relpath to cwd for vcs dirtiness report (rust-lang/cargo#14970) - Enable triagebot merge conflict notifications (rust-lang/cargo#14972) - fixed the error message for a user to open the crate (rust-lang/cargo#14969) - fix(package): show dirty filepaths relative to git workdir (rust-lang/cargo#14968) - Add the `test` cfg as a well known cfg before of compiler change (rust-lang/cargo#14963) - refactor(cargo-package): let-else to flatten code (rust-lang/cargo#14959) - fix(cargo-package): add more traces (rust-lang/cargo#14960) - Do not hash absolute sysroot path into stdlib crates metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#14951) - docs: add missing argument to Rustup Cargo workaround (rust-lang/cargo#14954) - fix(cargo-rustc): stabilize higher precedence trailing flags (rust-lang/cargo#14900)
Thanks. for future PRs, remember that you can clean commit history and force push in your local branch instead of creating another PR. |
What does this PR try to resolve?
This PR is resolving an issue where
cargo doc --open --examples
does not give a clear message when the examples file is given to it.I changed the message from
no crates with documentation
in the cargo_doc.rs and doc.rs torequested crate documentation is not available to open
. Now it becomes easy for the user to understand what they're missing.Fixes #14776
How should we test and review this PR?
Here is the command through which you can test this change:
cargo test SNAPSHOTS=overwrite -- doc::open_no_doc_crate