You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm open to different naming conventions of the lane comparisons, but I think it's best if they're not ambiguous with PartialEq etc. These functions may also be duplicated in traits if multiple mask widths end up being supported.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Lanewise comparisons:
lanes_eq
lanes_ne
lanes_lt
lanes_le
lanes_gt
lanes_ge
is_positive
/is_sign_positive
is_negative
/is_sign_negative
is_finite
is_infinite
is_nan
is_normal
Other comparisons:
any_of
/all_of
any_nan
/all_nan
I'm open to different naming conventions of the lane comparisons, but I think it's best if they're not ambiguous with
PartialEq
etc. These functions may also be duplicated in traits if multiple mask widths end up being supported.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: