-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rustup to latest rustc master #4328
Conversation
Broken due to: * rust-lang/rust#63180 (`Existential` -> `OpaqueTy`) * rust-lang/rust#63121 (New fields for `FormatSpec`)
@bors r+ doesn't seem very controversial, so I'm going to r+ myself |
📌 Commit d61df4f has been approved by |
Rustup to latest rustc master Broken due to: * rust-lang/rust#63180 (`Existential` -> `OpaqueTy`) * rust-lang/rust#63121 (New fields for `FormatSpec`)
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
In
with
It looks like that is the correct way to ignore if a command fails. The format test should be able to handle rustfmt being missing. |
Thanks, let's see if that works! @bors r+ |
📌 Commit ff59f4a has been approved by |
Rustup to latest rustc master Broken due to: * rust-lang/rust#63180 (`Existential` -> `OpaqueTy`) * rust-lang/rust#63121 (New fields for `FormatSpec`)
@bors retry (forgot changelog) |
Rustup to latest rustc master Broken due to: changelog: none * rust-lang/rust#63180 (`Existential` -> `OpaqueTy`) * rust-lang/rust#63121 (New fields for `FormatSpec`)
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
@bors retry (spurious) |
Rustup to latest rustc master Broken due to: * rust-lang/rust#63180 (`Existential` -> `OpaqueTy`) * rust-lang/rust#63121 (New fields for `FormatSpec`) changelog: none
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
Broken due to:
existential type
to type aliasimpl Trait
rust#63180 (Existential
->OpaqueTy
)format!()
arg count mismatch provide extra info rust#63121 (New fields forFormatSpec
)changelog: none