Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values #108531

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2023

Conversation

Coca162
Copy link
Contributor

@Coca162 Coca162 commented Feb 27, 2023

The rust reference currently says that repeated values for arrays can be constant or Copy

repeat operand is Copy or that it must be a path to a constant item

This updates the rust documentation on primitive arrays to reflect what the rust reference says (and also compiler suggestions if you do not use a const item)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 27, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 27, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 27, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Feb 28, 2023

Seems good to me.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2023

📌 Commit 22b65fc has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 28, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
…, r=thomcc

rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values

The [rust reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/array-expr.html) currently says that repeated values for arrays can be constant or `Copy`
> repeat operand is [Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/special-types-and-traits.html#copy) or that it must be a [path](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/path-expr.html) to a constant item

This updates the rust documentation on primitive arrays to reflect what the rust reference says (and also compiler suggestions if you do not use a `const` item)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108297 (Exit when there are unmatched delims to avoid noisy diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#108531 (rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values)
 - rust-lang#108536 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#108550 (Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature)
 - rust-lang#108551 (Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization)
 - rust-lang#108554 (Only look for param in item's generics if it actually comes from generics)
 - rust-lang#108555 (Fix a race in the query system)
 - rust-lang#108558 (add missing feature in core/tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2455185 into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Mar 1, 2023
@Coca162 Coca162 deleted the rustdoc-repeat-const-array branch March 2, 2023 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants