Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Iterator::collect_into documentation #109337

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

frengor
Copy link
Contributor

@frengor frengor commented Mar 19, 2023

This improves the examples in the documentation of Iterator::collect_into, replacing the usages of println! with assert_eq! as suggested on IRLO.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 19, 2023

r? @scottmcm

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 19, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 19, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2023

📌 Commit 0c51d0d has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 20, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#109249 (Update names/comments for new return-position impl trait in trait lowering strategy)
 - rust-lang#109259 (rustdoc: Fix missing private inlining)
 - rust-lang#109269 (rustdoc: cleanup some intermediate allocs)
 - rust-lang#109301 (fix: fix ICE in `custom-test-frameworks` feature)
 - rust-lang#109319 (Add test for `c_variadic` in rustdoc-json)
 - rust-lang#109323 (Ignore files in .gitignore in mir opt check)
 - rust-lang#109331 (rustdoc: implement bag semantics for function parameter search)
 - rust-lang#109337 (Improve `Iterator::collect_into` documentation)
 - rust-lang#109351 (rustdoc: Remove footnote references from doc summary)
 - rust-lang#109353 (Fix wrong crate name in custom MIR docs)
 - rust-lang#109362 (Split `items` from `-Zmeta-stats` in two.)
 - rust-lang#109370 (fix ClashingExternDeclarations lint ICE)
 - rust-lang#109375 (rustdoc: Fix improper escaping of deprecation reasons)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fb4f015 into rust-lang:master Mar 20, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants