-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #110679
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #110679
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Use `cargo metadata` to determine whether a crate has a library package or not - Collect metadata for all workspaces, not just the root workspace and cargo - Don't pass `--lib` for crates without a library - Use `run_cargo_test` for rust-installer - Don't build documentation in `lint-docs` if `--no-doc` is passed
Refactor `SyntaxContext::ctxt` logic. I'm still trying to make a test from the issue. cc `@deepink-mas` does this solve the issue? Fixes rust-lang#110230
…levant_impl, r=b-naber Remove `find_map_relevant_impl` Fixes rust-lang#108895
bootstrap: Unify test argument handling Fixes rust-lang#104198. Does *not* help with rust-lang#80124 because I couldn't figure out a reasonable way to omit `--lib` only for `panic_abort` and not other `std` dependencies. - Remove unnecessary `test_kind` field and `TestKind` struct. These are just subsets of the existing `builder.kind` / `Kind` struct. - Add a new `run_cargo_test` function which handles passing arguments to cargo based on `builder.config` - Switch all Steps in `mod test` to `run_cargo_test` where possible - Combine several steps into one `CrateBootstrap` step. These tests all do the same thing, just with different crate names. - Fix `x test --no-doc`. This is much simpler after the refactors mentioned earlier, but I'm happy to split it into a separate PR if desired. Before, this would panic a lot because steps forgot to pass `--lib`.
…t, r=jyn514 stop `x fmt` formatting untracked directories I don't think there's anything else to do? I've confirmed that you get a "skip untracked path foo/ during rustfmt invocations" for the alternative build directory. r? `@jyn514`
…e-asm, r=workingjubilee allow array-style simd in inline asm Required for [MCP#621](rust-lang/compiler-team#621) to be implemented. r? `@workingjubilee`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Apr 22, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 22, 2023
⌛ Testing commit f4c51bf with merge 41d3d549c722ccc220a0224172f6243abd66b517... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
removed
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 22, 2023
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Apr 22, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
SyntaxContext::ctxt
logic. #110497 (RefactorSyntaxContext::ctxt
logic.)find_map_relevant_impl
#110514 (Removefind_map_relevant_impl
)x fmt
formatting untracked directories #110664 (stopx fmt
formatting untracked directories)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup