Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't mention already-set fields in struct constructor missing field error #112323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Fixes #111149

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 5, 2023

r? @WaffleLapkin

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 5, 2023
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ error[E0559]: variant `Option<_>::None` has no field named `value`
|
LL | None { value: (), ..Default::default() }.await;
| ^^^^^ `Option<_>::None` does not have this field
|
= note: all struct fields are already assigned
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps this could be a span-suggestion to remove the field altogether, but honestly I'm fine with just letting the programmer decide what to do with this

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think making a suggestion would be better, but it's fine as-is

@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ error[E0559]: variant `Option<_>::None` has no field named `value`
|
LL | None { value: (), ..Default::default() }.await;
| ^^^^^ `Option<_>::None` does not have this field
|
= note: all struct fields are already assigned
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think making a suggestion would be better, but it's fine as-is

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 8, 2023

📌 Commit 140c011 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 8, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
…ields, r=WaffleLapkin

Don't mention already-set fields in struct constructor missing field error

Fixes rust-lang#111149
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#112323 (Don't mention already-set fields in struct constructor missing field error)
 - rust-lang#112395 (Add Terminator::InlineAsm conversion from MIR to SMIR)
 - rust-lang#112411 (add programmerjake to portable-simd cc list)
 - rust-lang#112428 (Structurally resolve pointee in `check_pat_lit`)
 - rust-lang#112444 (Don't debug-print `Interned` or `PrivateZst`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 17cc282 into rust-lang:master Jun 9, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 9, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the dont-mention-set-fields branch August 11, 2023 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Skip filled in fields when suggesting field names
4 participants