Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LTA: Actually check where-clauses for well-formedness at the def site #136432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented Feb 2, 2025

All of the added tests used to wrongfully pass.

r? oli-obk or types/compiler or reassign

@fmease fmease added the F-lazy_type_alias `#![feature(lazy_type_alias)]` label Feb 2, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 2, 2025
@fmease fmease changed the title LTA: Actually check where-clauses at the def site for well-formedness LTA: Actually check where-clauses for well-formedness at the def site Feb 2, 2025
@fmease fmease force-pushed the lta-fix-def-site-checks branch 2 times, most recently from e268763 to 901450d Compare February 2, 2025 11:40
Some(WellFormedLoc::Ty(def_id)),
item_ty.into(),
);
check_where_clauses(wfcx, item.span, def_id);
Copy link
Member Author

@fmease fmease Feb 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've basically just added check_where_clause and inlined check_item_type. I could've made it work without inlining but that wouldn't've been super nice (it's already quite branch-y and that would've made it worse)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah, check_item_type is jank and didn't really make sense since it's otherwise only used for consts/statics.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me after changing the test or whatever you wanted to do

Some(WellFormedLoc::Ty(def_id)),
item_ty.into(),
);
check_where_clauses(wfcx, item.span, def_id);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah, check_item_type is jank and didn't really make sense since it's otherwise only used for consts/statics.

@fmease fmease force-pushed the lta-fix-def-site-checks branch from 901450d to c371363 Compare February 3, 2025 02:47
@fmease
Copy link
Member Author

fmease commented Feb 3, 2025

@bors r=compiler-errors rollup (affects unstable features only)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 3, 2025

📌 Commit c371363 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 3, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#136356 (Docs for f16 and f128: correct a typo and add details)
 - rust-lang#136404 (Remove a footgun-y feature / relic of the past from the compiletest DSL)
 - rust-lang#136432 (LTA: Actually check where-clauses for well-formedness at the def site)
 - rust-lang#136438 (miri: improve error when offset_from preconditions are violated)
 - rust-lang#136441 ([`compiletest`-related cleanups 1/7] Cleanup `is_rustdoc` logic and remove a useless path join in rustdoc-json runtest logic)
 - rust-lang#136455 (Remove some `Clone` bounds and derives.)
 - rust-lang#136464 (Remove hook calling via `TyCtxtAt`.)
 - rust-lang#136467 (override default config profile on tarballs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1df7b30 into rust-lang:master Feb 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Feb 3, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136432 - fmease:lta-fix-def-site-checks, r=compiler-errors

LTA: Actually check where-clauses for well-formedness at the def site

All of the added tests used to wrongfully pass.

r? oli-obk or types/compiler or reassign
@fmease fmease deleted the lta-fix-def-site-checks branch February 3, 2025 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
F-lazy_type_alias `#![feature(lazy_type_alias)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants