-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #75765
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #75765
+65
−161
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
remove_dir will error if the path doesn't exist or isn't a directory. It's useful to clarify that this is "remove dir or fail" not "remove dir if it exists". I don't think this belongs in the title. "Removes an existing, empty directory" is strangely worded-- there's no such thing as a non-existing directory. Better to just say explicitly it will return an error.
Use two printlns when testing that writing to a closed stdout does not panic. Otherwise the test is ineffective, since the current implementation silently ignores the error during first println regardless.
Can't link from `core` to `std` yet.
One of the original links was linking to the wrong thing as well. Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <[email protected]>
clarify documentation of remove_dir errors remove_dir will error if the path doesn't exist or isn't a directory. It's useful to clarify that this is "remove dir or fail" not "remove dir if it exists". I don't think this belongs in the title. "Removes an existing, empty directory" is strangely worded-- there's no such thing as a non-existing directory. Better to just say explicitly it will return an error.
Fix RFC-1014 test Use two printlns when testing that writing to a closed stdout does not panic. Otherwise the test is ineffective, since the current implementation silently ignores the error during first println regardless.
Update mailmap for mati865
…sult, r=jyn514 Switch to intra-doc links in `core::result` Part of rust-lang#75080. @rustbot modify labels: A-intra-doc-links T-doc T-rustdoc
…, r=jyn514 Move to intra doc links for std::thread documentation Helps with rust-lang#75080. @rustbot modify labels: T-doc, A-intra-doc-links, T-rustdoc r? @jyn514
📌 Commit 2a7f868 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Aug 21, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
core::result
#75727 (Switch to intra-doc links incore::result
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost