Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't treat unnormalized function arguments as well-formed #91243

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ impl UniversalRegionRelationsBuilder<'cx, 'tcx> {
debug!("build: input_or_output={:?}", ty);
// We add implied bounds from both the unnormalized and normalized ty
// See issue #87748
let constraints_implied_1 = self.add_implied_bounds(ty);
let TypeOpOutput { output: norm_ty, constraints: constraints1, .. } = self
.param_env
.and(type_op::normalize::Normalize::new(ty))
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -284,10 +283,9 @@ impl UniversalRegionRelationsBuilder<'cx, 'tcx> {
// }
// ```
// Both &Self::Bar and &() are WF
let constraints_implied_2 =
if ty != norm_ty { self.add_implied_bounds(norm_ty) } else { None };
let constraints_implied = self.add_implied_bounds(norm_ty);
normalized_inputs_and_output.push(norm_ty);
constraints1.into_iter().chain(constraints_implied_1).chain(constraints_implied_2)
constraints1.into_iter().chain(constraints_implied)
})
.collect();

Expand Down
7 changes: 1 addition & 6 deletions compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/compare_method.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -266,14 +266,9 @@ fn compare_predicate_entailment<'tcx>(
// First liberate late bound regions and subst placeholders
let trait_sig = tcx.liberate_late_bound_regions(impl_m.def_id, tcx.fn_sig(trait_m.def_id));
let trait_sig = trait_sig.subst(tcx, trait_to_placeholder_substs);
// Next, add all inputs and output as well-formed tys. Importantly,
// we have to do this before normalization, since the normalized ty may
// not contain the input parameters. See issue #87748.
wf_tys.extend(trait_sig.inputs_and_output.iter());
let trait_sig =
inh.normalize_associated_types_in(impl_m_span, impl_m_hir_id, param_env, trait_sig);
// Also add the resulting inputs and output as well-formed.
// This probably isn't strictly necessary.
// Add the resulting inputs and output as well-formed.
wf_tys.extend(trait_sig.inputs_and_output.iter());
let trait_fty = tcx.mk_fn_ptr(ty::Binder::dummy(trait_sig));

Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -391,7 +391,6 @@ fn typeck_with_fallback<'tcx>(
let mut wf_tys = FxHashSet::default();
// Compute the fty from point of view of inside the fn.
let fn_sig = tcx.liberate_late_bound_regions(def_id.to_def_id(), fn_sig);
wf_tys.extend(fn_sig.inputs_and_output.iter());
let fn_sig = inh.normalize_associated_types_in(
body.value.span,
body_id.hir_id,
Expand Down
5 changes: 0 additions & 5 deletions compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/wfcheck.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1322,11 +1322,6 @@ fn check_fn_or_method<'fcx, 'tcx>(
) {
let sig = fcx.tcx.liberate_late_bound_regions(def_id, sig);

// Unnormalized types in signature are WF too
implied_bounds.extend(sig.inputs());
// FIXME(#27579) return types should not be implied bounds
implied_bounds.insert(sig.output());

// Normalize the input and output types one at a time, using a different
// `WellFormedLoc` for each. We cannot call `normalize_associated_types`
// on the entire `FnSig`, since this would use the same `WellFormedLoc`
Expand Down
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/fn/implied-bounds-unnorm-associated-type.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
// check-fail
// See issue #91068. Types in the substs of an associated type can't be implied
// to be WF, since they don't actually have to be constructed.

trait Trait {
type Type;
}

impl<T> Trait for T {
type Type = ();
}

fn f<'a, 'b>(s: &'b str, _: <&'a &'b () as Trait>::Type) -> &'a str {
s //~ ERROR lifetime mismatch [E0623]
}

fn main() {
let x = String::from("Hello World!");
let y = f(&x, ());
drop(x);
println!("{}", y);
}
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/fn/implied-bounds-unnorm-associated-type.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
error[E0623]: lifetime mismatch
--> $DIR/implied-bounds-unnorm-associated-type.rs:14:5
|
LL | fn f<'a, 'b>(s: &'b str, _: <&'a &'b () as Trait>::Type) -> &'a str {
| ------- ----------
| |
| these two types are declared with different lifetimes...
LL | s
| ^ ...but data from `s` flows here

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0623`.
30 changes: 0 additions & 30 deletions src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/issue-87748.rs

This file was deleted.