Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #95291

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Mar 25, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 18 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/metadata.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -166,6 +166,13 @@ fn build_pointer_or_reference_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
pointee_type: Ty<'tcx>,
unique_type_id: UniqueTypeId<'tcx>,
) -> DINodeCreationResult<'ll> {
// The debuginfo generated by this function is only valid if `ptr_type` is really just
// a (fat) pointer. Make sure it is not called for e.g. `Box<T, NonZSTAllocator>`.
debug_assert_eq!(
cx.size_and_align_of(ptr_type),
cx.size_and_align_of(cx.tcx.mk_mut_ptr(pointee_type))
);

let pointee_type_di_node = type_di_node(cx, pointee_type);

return_if_di_node_created_in_meantime!(cx, unique_type_id);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -212,7 +219,17 @@ fn build_pointer_or_reference_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
DIFlags::FlagZero,
),
|cx, owner| {
let layout = cx.layout_of(ptr_type);
// FIXME: If this fat pointer is a `Box` then we don't want to use its
// type layout and instead use the layout of the raw pointer inside
// of it.
// The proper way to handle this is to not treat Box as a pointer
// at all and instead emit regular struct debuginfo for it. We just
// need to make sure that we don't break existing debuginfo consumers
// by doing that (at least not without a warning period).
let layout_type =
if ptr_type.is_box() { cx.tcx.mk_mut_ptr(pointee_type) } else { ptr_type };

let layout = cx.layout_of(layout_type);
let addr_field = layout.field(cx, abi::FAT_PTR_ADDR);
let extra_field = layout.field(cx, abi::FAT_PTR_EXTRA);

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/promote_consts.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ pub struct PromoteTemps<'tcx> {

impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for PromoteTemps<'tcx> {
fn phase_change(&self) -> Option<MirPhase> {
Some(MirPhase::ConstPromotion)
Some(MirPhase::ConstsPromoted)
}

fn run_pass(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
Expand Down
74 changes: 47 additions & 27 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -266,30 +266,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
);
}
}
// The deaggregator currently does not deaggreagate arrays.
// So for now, we ignore them here.
Rvalue::Aggregate(box AggregateKind::Array { .. }, _) => {}
// All other aggregates must be gone after some phases.
Rvalue::Aggregate(box kind, _) => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::DropLowering
&& !matches!(kind, AggregateKind::Generator(..))
{
// Generators persist until the state machine transformation, but all
// other aggregates must have been lowered.
self.fail(
location,
format!("{:?} have been lowered to field assignments", rvalue),
)
} else if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::GeneratorLowering {
// No more aggregates after drop and generator lowering.
Rvalue::Aggregate(agg_kind, _) => {
let disallowed = match **agg_kind {
AggregateKind::Array(..) => false,
AggregateKind::Generator(..) => {
self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::GeneratorsLowered
}
_ => self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Deaggregated,
};
if disallowed {
self.fail(
location,
format!("{:?} have been lowered to field assignments", rvalue),
)
}
}
Rvalue::Ref(_, BorrowKind::Shallow, _) => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::DropLowering {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`Assign` statement with a `Shallow` borrow should have been removed after drop lowering phase",
Expand All @@ -300,15 +293,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::DropLowering {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`AscribeUserType` should have been removed after drop lowering phase",
);
}
}
StatementKind::FakeRead(..) => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::DropLowering {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`FakeRead` should have been removed after drop lowering phase",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -351,10 +344,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
self.fail(location, format!("bad arg ({:?} != usize)", op_cnt_ty))
}
}
StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { .. }
| StatementKind::StorageLive(..)
StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { .. } => {
if self.mir_phase < MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(location, "`SetDiscriminant` is not allowed until drop elaboration");
}
}
StatementKind::Retag(_, _) => {
// FIXME(JakobDegen) The validator should check that `self.mir_phase <
// DropsLowered`. However, this causes ICEs with generation of drop shims, which
// seem to fail to set their `MirPhase` correctly.
}
StatementKind::StorageLive(..)
| StatementKind::StorageDead(..)
| StatementKind::Retag(_, _)
| StatementKind::Coverage(_)
| StatementKind::Nop => {}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -424,10 +425,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
TerminatorKind::DropAndReplace { target, unwind, .. } => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::DropLowering {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`DropAndReplace` is not permitted to exist after drop elaboration",
"`DropAndReplace` should have been removed during drop elaboration",
);
}
self.check_edge(location, *target, EdgeKind::Normal);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -494,7 +495,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
TerminatorKind::Yield { resume, drop, .. } => {
if self.mir_phase > MirPhase::GeneratorLowering {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::GeneratorsLowered {
self.fail(location, "`Yield` should have been replaced by generator lowering");
}
self.check_edge(location, *resume, EdgeKind::Normal);
Expand All @@ -503,10 +504,22 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
TerminatorKind::FalseEdge { real_target, imaginary_target } => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`FalseEdge` should have been removed after drop elaboration",
);
}
self.check_edge(location, *real_target, EdgeKind::Normal);
self.check_edge(location, *imaginary_target, EdgeKind::Normal);
}
TerminatorKind::FalseUnwind { real_target, unwind } => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::DropsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`FalseUnwind` should have been removed after drop elaboration",
);
}
self.check_edge(location, *real_target, EdgeKind::Normal);
if let Some(unwind) = unwind {
self.check_edge(location, *unwind, EdgeKind::Unwind);
Expand All @@ -520,12 +533,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
self.check_edge(location, *cleanup, EdgeKind::Unwind);
}
}
TerminatorKind::GeneratorDrop => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::GeneratorsLowered {
self.fail(
location,
"`GeneratorDrop` should have been replaced by generator lowering",
);
}
}
// Nothing to validate for these.
TerminatorKind::Resume
| TerminatorKind::Abort
| TerminatorKind::Return
| TerminatorKind::Unreachable
| TerminatorKind::GeneratorDrop => {}
| TerminatorKind::Unreachable => {}
}

self.super_terminator(terminator, location);
Expand Down
28 changes: 22 additions & 6 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::{Canonical, CanonicalVarValues};
use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::{ConstVarValue, ConstVariableValue};
use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::{ConstVariableOrigin, ConstVariableOriginKind, ToType};
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::EvalToConstValueResult;
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::{ErrorHandled, EvalToConstValueResult};
use rustc_middle::traits::select;
use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
use rustc_middle::ty::fold::{TypeFoldable, TypeFolder};
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -71,7 +70,6 @@ mod sub;
pub mod type_variable;
mod undo_log;

use crate::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
pub use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key;

#[must_use]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -687,15 +685,28 @@ pub struct CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx> {
impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
/// calls `tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts` after
/// canonicalizing the consts.
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub fn try_unify_abstract_consts(
&self,
a: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
b: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
) -> bool {
let canonical = self.canonicalize_query((a, b), &mut OriginalQueryValues::default());
debug!("canonical consts: {:?}", &canonical.value);
// Reject any attempt to unify two unevaluated constants that contain inference
// variables, since inference variables in queries lead to ICEs.
if a.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts()
|| b.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts()
|| param_env.has_infer_types_or_consts()
{
debug!("a or b or param_env contain infer vars in its substs -> cannot unify");
return false;
}

let param_env_and = param_env.and((a, b));
let erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(param_env_and);
debug!("after erase_regions: {:?}", erased);

self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(canonical.value)
self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(erased)
}

pub fn is_in_snapshot(&self) -> bool {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1598,22 +1609,27 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
///
/// This handles inferences variables within both `param_env` and `substs` by
/// performing the operation on their respective canonical forms.
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub fn const_eval_resolve(
&self,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
unevaluated: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx>,
span: Option<Span>,
) -> EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> {
let substs = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(unevaluated.substs);
debug!(?substs);

// Postpone the evaluation of constants whose substs depend on inference
// variables
if substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
debug!("substs have infer types or consts: {:?}", substs);
return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
}

let param_env_erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(param_env);
let substs_erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(substs);
debug!(?param_env_erased);
debug!(?substs_erased);

let unevaluated = ty::Unevaluated {
def: unevaluated.def,
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/queries.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
use super::{ErrorHandled, EvalToConstValueResult, GlobalId};

use crate::mir;
use crate::ty::fold::TypeFoldable;
use crate::ty::subst::InternalSubsts;
use crate::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -38,6 +39,16 @@ impl<'tcx> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
ct: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx>,
span: Option<Span>,
) -> EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> {
// Cannot resolve `Unevaluated` constants that contain inference
// variables. We reject those here since `resolve_opt_const_arg`
// would fail otherwise.
//
// When trying to evaluate constants containing inference variables,
// use `Infcx::const_eval_resolve` instead.
if ct.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
bug!("did not expect inference variables here");
}

match ty::Instance::resolve_opt_const_arg(self, param_env, ct.def, ct.substs) {
Ok(Some(instance)) => {
let cid = GlobalId { instance, promoted: ct.promoted };
Expand Down
Loading