-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix x doc --stage 0 compiler
#95449
Merged
Merged
Fix x doc --stage 0 compiler
#95449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Eric figured out the fix to this almost 2 years ago, I just didn't read his comment carefully enough at the timme. The issue was that fake rustc and fake rustdoc were inconsistent about when they passed `--sysroot` to the real compiler. Change them to consistently only pass it when `--target` is present.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 29, 2022
Seems reasonable to me, as it mirrors the behavior of the rustc wrapper, and seems to work locally. @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 064a559 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 5, 2022
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2022
Fix `x doc --stage 0 compiler` Eric figured out the fix to this almost 2 years ago, I just didn't read his comment carefully enough at the timme. The issue was that fake rustc and fake rustdoc were inconsistent about when they passed `--sysroot` to the real compiler. Change them to consistently only pass it when `--target` is present. cc rust-lang#74976 (comment) Fixes rust-lang#79980 r? `@ehuss`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95234 (bootstrap.py: nixos check in /etc/os-release with quotes) - rust-lang#95449 (Fix `x doc --stage 0 compiler`) - rust-lang#95512 (diagnostics: translation infrastructure) - rust-lang#95607 (Note invariance reason for FnDef types) - rust-lang#95645 (Fix intra doc link ICE when trying to get traits in scope for primitive) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Thanks a bunch for fixing this, will save me quite some time! |
jyn514
added a commit
to jyn514/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2022
I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
This was referenced Apr 13, 2022
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2022
…Simulacrum Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std` I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
fee1-dead
added a commit
to fee1-dead-contrib/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2022
…Simulacrum Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std` I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2022
…Simulacrum Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std` I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2022
…mulacrum Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std` I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Eric figured out the fix to this almost 2 years ago, I just didn't read his comment carefully enough at the timme.
The issue was that fake rustc and fake rustdoc were inconsistent about when they passed
--sysroot
to the real compiler.Change them to consistently only pass it when
--target
is present.cc #74976 (comment)
Fixes #79980
r? @ehuss