Adds Env.whereis_pid #456
Merged
Adds Env.whereis_pid #456
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! Can you fix the formatting job? Apart from that, this looks great! :) |
|
My bad; it is fixed now! |
evnu
approved these changes
May 30, 2022
|
Thank you! 😍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had the requirement to use
whereis_pidin my code.However, until now,
enif_whereis_pidwas exposed byrustler_sysbut not wrapped byrustler; there was no way to build a new LocalPid from the returned ErlNifPid (without transmuting).This PR adds a safe wrapper around it.
Please let me know what you think about the signature and the implementation.