Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2019.2] Merge forward from 2019.2.1 to 2019.2 #52695

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Apr 26, 2019

Conversation

Ch3LL
Copy link
Contributor

@Ch3LL Ch3LL commented Apr 25, 2019

no conflicts

jeroen92 and others added 30 commits April 15, 2019 11:45
Since "pchanges" was never supported in the state compiler, and
"changes" is what these reqs always used, replacing "pchanges" with
"changes" will allow those requisites to work in test mode.

Conflicts:
  - salt/states/file.py
  - salt/states/linux_acl.py
  - salt/utils/napalm.py
  - tests/integration/modules/test_state.py
  - tests/unit/states/test_file.py
This allows for a state return dict to be repacked so that the top level
keys are the IDs, making it much easier to analyze and craft asserts
against the results.
this requisite passes a __prerequired__ kwarg so these need to support
**kwargs for that reason.

This also changes the comment for salt.function in test mode because
it's inaccurate and doesn't make sense.

Conflicts:
  - salt/states/test.py
Conflicts:
  - tests/unit/states/test_file.py
Conflicts:
  - tests/unit/states/test_file.py
Conflicts:
  - salt/modules/win_file.py
  - salt/states/file.py
Conflicts:
  - salt/states/file.py
[2019.2.1] Update test_schema to mirror the new ValidationErrors in 3.0.0
[2019.2.1] Update integration.modules.test_network.NetworkTest.test_network_ping…
The peers.conf addition for the x509 state tests broke the
salt.modules.publish tests. Move the configuration to the test master's
config. Also increase the publish call timeout in the x509 module to
make the x509 state tests reliable on all platforms.
@s0undt3ch s0undt3ch merged commit d7cd162 into saltstack:2019.2 Apr 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants