Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include 'Capfile' in excluded filenames #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2017

Conversation

mark-dce
Copy link
Contributor

@mark-dce mark-dce commented Aug 6, 2017

Folks using Capistrano will have a 'Capfile' in their application root. They may also define deployment stages based on the hostname of the server which may use dashes rather than snake case.

Folks using Capistrano will have a 'Capfile' in their application root.   They may also define deployment stages based on the hostname of the server which may use dashes rather than snake case.
@mark-dce mark-dce requested a review from no-reply August 6, 2017 21:42
mark-dce added a commit to curationexperts/epigaea that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2017
Provides exclusions for Capistrano files that may violate
file naming cops.  These exclusions can be removed if the corresponding
Bixby PR samvera/bixby#4 is accepted.
mark-dce added a commit to curationexperts/epigaea that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2017
Provides exclusions for Capistrano files that may violate
file naming cops.  These exclusions can be removed if the corresponding
Bixby PR samvera/bixby#4 is accepted.
mark-dce added a commit to curationexperts/epigaea that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2017
Provides exclusions for Capistrano files that may violate
file naming cops.  These exclusions can be removed if the corresponding
Bixby PR samvera/bixby#4 is accepted.
@no-reply no-reply merged commit 934f7e0 into master Aug 7, 2017
@no-reply no-reply deleted the capistrano_compatibility branch August 7, 2017 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants