Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move SolrService deprecation target to 4.0 #3943

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2019
Merged

Conversation

no-reply
Copy link
Contributor

@no-reply no-reply commented Sep 4, 2019

The new interfaces will first be released in 3.0.0, so we can't remove the old
ones until 4.0.

@samvera/hyrax-code-reviewers

cjcolvar
cjcolvar previously approved these changes Sep 5, 2019
Copy link
Member

@cjcolvar cjcolvar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me. I'm not sure why this build is failing. Maybe if you rebase it will pass? Or maybe it's not worth fixing?

Tom Johnson added 2 commits September 6, 2019 10:38
The new interfaces will first be released in 3.0.0, so we can't remove the old
ones until 4.0.
@no-reply
Copy link
Contributor Author

no-reply commented Sep 6, 2019

I suspect there's something up with the build cache. Other PRs are failing with similar errors.

I can't look into it until later today, though.

@no-reply
Copy link
Contributor Author

no-reply commented Sep 6, 2019

If my assumption is true, a bump to .regen should do the trick.

@no-reply
Copy link
Contributor Author

no-reply commented Sep 6, 2019

actually, i'm pretty sure that's the deal.

rebase in (and .regen bumped as a result). let's see if it builds.

@no-reply no-reply merged commit 1d3d6ed into master Sep 6, 2019
@no-reply no-reply deleted the instance-deprecation branch September 6, 2019 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants