Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the build matrix #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2017
Merged

Update the build matrix #86

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2017

Conversation

no-reply
Copy link

The proposed changes are:

  • Build on latest Ruby 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4.
  • Move jruby build to latest.
  • Add build for ruby-head with failures allowed.

In addition to this, I propose to add a weekly travis cron job to build master against this matrix.

@no-reply no-reply force-pushed the update-build-matrix branch from 93c25e7 to 16b439b Compare November 10, 2017 18:12
The proposed changes are:

  - Build on latest Ruby 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4.
  - Add build for `ruby-head` with failures allowed.

In addition to this, I propose to add a weekly travis cron job to build
`master` against this matrix.
@no-reply no-reply force-pushed the update-build-matrix branch from 16b439b to d8ddf65 Compare November 10, 2017 18:27
@samvera samvera deleted a comment from coveralls Nov 10, 2017
@samvera samvera deleted a comment from coveralls Nov 10, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 10, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 82.363% when pulling d8ddf65 on update-build-matrix into e54fe6e on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 10, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 82.363% when pulling d8ddf65 on update-build-matrix into e54fe6e on master.

@jcoyne jcoyne merged commit 035e43e into master Nov 13, 2017
@jcoyne jcoyne deleted the update-build-matrix branch November 13, 2017 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants