Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.24.3 #8213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/client (source) ^6.24.1 -> ^6.24.3 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 11:20
@renovate renovate bot requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team January 8, 2025 11:20
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge January 8, 2025 11:20
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 9, 2025 7:46pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 7:46pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 9, 2025 7:46pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 9, 2025 7:46pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 9, 2025 7:46pm

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 9, 2025 7:50 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 5s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 50s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 27s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 40s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 19:51:37 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 23.3 efps (43ms) 22.5 efps (45ms) +2ms (+3.5%)
article (body) 50.5 efps (20ms) 47.8 efps (21ms) +1ms (+5.6%)
article (string inside object) 26.3 efps (38ms) 24.1 efps (42ms) +4ms (+9.2%)
article (string inside array) 23.3 efps (43ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) +4ms (+9.3%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (description) 58.8 efps (17ms) 57.1 efps (18ms) +1ms (+2.9%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.5 efps (54ms) 18.5 efps (54ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) +0ms (-/-%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 43ms 48ms 79ms 440ms 901ms 10.5s
article (body) 20ms 22ms 27ms 211ms 250ms 5.9s
article (string inside object) 38ms 41ms 48ms 85ms 152ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 43ms 47ms 54ms 198ms 371ms 7.3s
recipe (name) 20ms 21ms 24ms 41ms 0ms 7.0s
recipe (description) 17ms 19ms 22ms 38ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 9ms 9ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 54ms 60ms 70ms 340ms 1110ms 12.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 58ms 366ms 382ms 8.0s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 45ms 67ms 75ms 539ms 1089ms 11.2s
article (body) 21ms 26ms 32ms 172ms 263ms 6.2s
article (string inside object) 42ms 43ms 46ms 75ms 159ms 7.0s
article (string inside array) 47ms 49ms 54ms 108ms 296ms 7.4s
recipe (name) 20ms 21ms 23ms 48ms 0ms 7.6s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 35ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 8ms 11ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 54ms 57ms 60ms 100ms 660ms 11.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 53ms 61ms 253ms 1031ms 8.4s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch from 1170f5d to 1b73a6c Compare January 8, 2025 11:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch from 1b73a6c to dac3c93 Compare January 9, 2025 00:47
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.24.2 fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.24.3 Jan 9, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch from dac3c93 to 9c7a9c8 Compare January 9, 2025 08:24
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch from 9c7a9c8 to 93ef815 Compare January 9, 2025 11:08
@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 47577ea Jan 10, 2025
54 of 55 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch January 10, 2025 00:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant