Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose service and cluster CIDR in the api #90

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2017
Merged

Conversation

databus23
Copy link
Member

This allows users to optionally specify the service and cluster cidr when creating a cluster.
It can’t be changed afterwards.
By default it will still be set to

  • service CIDR: 198.18.128.0/17
  • pod CIDR: 198.19.0.0/16

We need this so we can re-create our parent clusters to avoid routing conflicts with the child clusters.

@SchwarzM Does kubernikusctl need changing to support creating a cluster with different CIDRs?

This allows users to optionally specify the service and cluster cidr when creating a cluster.
It can’t be changed afterwards.
@databus23 databus23 requested a review from BugRoger as a code owner November 3, 2017 12:11
@databus23 databus23 requested a review from SchwarzM November 3, 2017 12:12
@SchwarzM
Copy link
Contributor

SchwarzM commented Nov 3, 2017

no i am using the marshal method of the generated client
as long as the generated client cluster spec has been updated (i can see the update)
you will have to provide a different cluster spec to the tool nothing else

@databus23
Copy link
Member Author

databus23 commented Nov 6, 2017

Copy link
Contributor

@BugRoger BugRoger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

giphy

@databus23 databus23 merged commit 4676e61 into master Nov 6, 2017
@databus23 databus23 deleted the expose-cidr branch November 10, 2017 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants