-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Design better format for solutions.yaml #1582
Labels
complexity:easy
Something that requires less than a day to fix
kind:debt
Technical debt
topic:solutions
Anything related to external "Solutions" integration with the platform
Comments
sayf-eddine-scality
added
moonshot
topic:solutions
Anything related to external "Solutions" integration with the platform
complexity:easy
Something that requires less than a day to fix
labels
Aug 28, 2019
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
gdemonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2019
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
alexandre-allard
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2020
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
TeddyAndrieux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2020
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
TeddyAndrieux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2020
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
TeddyAndrieux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 24, 2020
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
TeddyAndrieux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2020
A new field, currently named `active` (may be a poor choice, we'll see with first user interactions, `activeVersions` could be more explicit), is introduced to set which version of a Solution should be used for the cluster-wide components of this Solution (i.e. the Admin UI and CRDs for now). Validation of the file format is added, using the usual `kind` and `apiVersion` fields. Later improvements could use some OpenAPI schema. Fixes: #1582
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
complexity:easy
Something that requires less than a day to fix
kind:debt
Technical debt
topic:solutions
Anything related to external "Solutions" integration with the platform
Component:
solutions, salt
Why this is needed:
we need to version-ize solutions.yaml and design a format for it
What should be done:
Implementation proposal (strongly recommended):
Test plan:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: