-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use alignment flag in slicing instead of attrs #154
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there no test that needs updating for the new behavior?
requirements/base.txt
Outdated
confuse==2.0.0 | ||
confuse==2.0.1 | ||
# via scipp | ||
graphlib-backport==1.0.3 | ||
# via scipp | ||
h5py==3.8.0 | ||
# via -r base.in | ||
numpy==1.24.1 | ||
h5py==3.9.0 | ||
# via -r requirements/base.in | ||
numpy==1.25.0 | ||
# via | ||
# h5py | ||
# scipp | ||
# scipy | ||
python-dateutil==2.8.2 | ||
# via -r base.in | ||
# via -r requirements/base.in | ||
pyyaml==6.0 | ||
# via confuse | ||
scipp==23.5.0 | ||
# via -r base.in | ||
scipy==1.10.0 | ||
# via -r base.in | ||
scipp==23.7.0 | ||
# via -r requirements/base.in | ||
scipy==1.11.1 | ||
# via -r requirements/base.in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, please avoid running global dependency updates alongside other changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replaced it with updating scipp only
Don't think so. There are tests that fail with the latest Scipp version and without this update. They compare slicing in ScippNeXus directly with slicing in Scipp. |
Fixes #150