Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NuGet binaries not strong named any more #38

Closed
springy76 opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

NuGet binaries not strong named any more #38

springy76 opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@springy76
Copy link

I also miss any kind of a changelog which would mention this and in general what changed between 1.1.3 and 1.1.6.

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Jun 29, 2016

Strong named : I don't know how to do that in the new project.json / .Net Core 1.0 RTM, please advice

Changelog:

  • 1.1.4 Update to dotnet rc2 and removed dependency on EntityFramework
  • 1.1.5 .Net Core 1.0 RTM + Changed dependency from JetBrains.Annotations to fix issues with System.Runtime
  • 1.1.6 Removed portable target to fix issues with .Net Core 1.0 RTM when using this project

@Thorium
Copy link
Collaborator

Thorium commented Jun 29, 2016

The key-file is provided LINQKit\src\LinqKit.Net45\LinqKit.snk and it was bound by *.csproj-file, but you can probably use also the Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs file adding the AssemblyKeyFileAttribute

@springy76
Copy link
Author

Personally I'll keep away from .Net Core 1.0 for at least 1-2 years -- Microsoft may call it RTM, I call it public beta test.

AssemblyKeyFileAttribute creates a compiler warning CS1699 since VS2005 -- I wonder why Microsoft added these to UWP at all.

@StefH StefH self-assigned this Jun 29, 2016
@StefH StefH added the feature label Jun 29, 2016
@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Jun 29, 2016

I used the original key-file. New NuGet has been created.

ReleaseNotes: https://github.com/scottksmith95/LINQKit/blob/master/ReleaseNotes.txt

Please verify

@springy76
Copy link
Author

looks good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants